A copy of this commentary in PDF format is available
here...
UK Air Quality
Thre Myth of the "Green" Electric Car
We are living through a period of quite dramatic change in
many technologies. Not the least of these is the move towards new power
technology for personal transport.
Just a century ago personal transport options were all but
unavailable to almost all of the UK population, but as the last century
progressed, everyday folk gained greater and greater access to affordable
personal transport. Effectively most such people bypassed horse and even horse
and cart or gig straight to horseless carriage.
We have seen a huge boom in ownership and use of personal
transport, particularly since the Second World War; first with ownership of
petrol-powered vehicles and then in the last quarter century, the rise in
popularity of diesel-powered vehicles. The number of cars has risen from just 2
million in 1950 to over 31 million today (diesel-powered now constituting 40%
of the fleet of cars compared to only 7% in 1994).
At the same time as this boom in ownership and use of
personal transport has taken place, so our air quality has dramatically and
steadily improved from the early post war recent low (mostly caused by coal
burning for home heating and cooking and electricity generation).
And yet we hear endless wailing and gnashing of teeth from
certain quarters about the terrible air quality and deaths ("premature" or
otherwise) caused by this air quality, despite improvement in life expectancy
in that time.
As those decades have passed we have also been told of the
wonderful opportunities afforded by the electric car (and previously endless
cheap electricity to power and heat our homes). Well the latter never quite
materialised, but the time for the former has finally arrived and it is now a
real and almost practical option for most people.
There remain several significant infrastructure hurdles to
overcome between now and the 2040 (and beyond) "ban" on the sale of new petrol
and diesel powered cars; availability of charging points and, of course, the
need to massively increase electricity-generating capacity, let alone improved
speed of charging and battery capacity.
These issues are all solvable over time (though speed of
charging might prove to be a challenge), just as the technology to extract oil,
and the growth in fuel refinement, production and distribution kept pace with
the growing demand from the ever-wealthier western consumers for personal
transport.
There remains one deeply intractable problem that makes the
idea of the "green" electric car a myth; namely electricity generation
technologies.
Using a mix of current generation technology we find that
far from being any "greener" than petrol or diesel powered cars, electric cars
are in fact "better" in one respect and worse in another, at least nationally.
Using Chris Lilly's "Next Green Car" analysis and web site
as a primary source of data ("https://www.nextgreencar.com"),
we can see that more-or-less like for like comparisons of class of current car,
yields CO2 and NOx (plus PM's) per kilometre driven
(calculating for 5,000 miles per year, in real world conditions with a normal
driving style):
Model
|
Fuel
|
g CO2
|
mfr
|
upstream
|
tailpipe
|
mg NOx+PMs
|
mfr
|
upstream
|
tailpipe
|
Jaguar XF 3.0 V6 RWD Auto
|
Diesel
|
280
|
34
|
45
|
203
|
344
|
93
|
102
|
150
|
Porsche Cayman 2.0 PDK
|
Petrol
|
258
|
26
|
45
|
188
|
214
|
73
|
113
|
27
|
Tesla S 100D
|
Electric
|
159
|
53
|
106
|
0
|
414
|
108
|
307
|
0
|
Tesla S 75D
|
Electric
|
152
|
52
|
99
|
0
|
393
|
106
|
287
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nissan Micra 1.5 dCi Visia
|
Diesel
|
168
|
21
|
36
|
121
|
267
|
57
|
61
|
149
|
Nissan Micra 1.0 Visia
|
Petrol
|
200
|
20
|
35
|
147
|
171
|
56
|
88
|
27
|
Nissan Leaf 24
|
Electric
|
110
|
37
|
72
|
0
|
285
|
76
|
209
|
0
|
Nissan Leaf 30
|
Electric
|
110
|
38
|
72
|
0
|
286
|
77
|
209
|
0
|
Nissan Leaf 40
|
Electric
|
109
|
39
|
70
|
0
|
281
|
78
|
203
|
0
|
Note these calculations DO NOT include roadside
particulate emissions from road surface, tyre or brake wear, nor emissions from
the end-of-life of vehicle scrap, recycling and waste management.
Note also that I have secondarily calculated upstream
electricity generation emissions from several sources based on various
generation technologies and the results fully verify those from NGC.
See also the NGC methodology for more information here ("https://www.nextgreencar.com/content/NGC-Emissions-Calculator-Methodology-2016-v2-3.pdf").
From this analysis we see clearly that there is a general CO2
advantage per mile or kilometre driven for electrically/battery-powered cars
(between 60 and 130 gCO2 per Km better), thanks to the mix of
current generation capacity.
But equally we see that on the basis of the same mix of
generation capacity, emissions of NOx and particulates for electric
vehicles are generally worse than for their like-for-like equivalent petrol and
diesel-powered vehicles (between 150 and 200 mg NOx+PMs per Km
worse), though not at the roadside, of course.
All of this, before factoring end-of-life and road usage
wear and tear, which reduces the relative advantage in the case of CO2
and increases the disadvantage further in the case of NOx and
particulates.
Note anyone claiming that CO2 is a pollutant
is simply not telling the truth. On planet earth Carbon and Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
are essential constituents of life, and without them NO life would exist.
Atmospheric CO2 and closed system "green house" warming effects are
separate issues entirely.
The only solutions to these facts are to move to nuclear,
hydro, wave, wind and/or solar electricity power generation and/or the
development of dramatically more efficient fossil fuel electricity generation
technology.
Until we see this major intractable obstacle overcome, the
"green" electric car, for all it's supposed allure and environmental
credentials, remains a myth peddled by politically/emotionally motivated and
commercially cynical lobbies and "rabbit caught in headlight" frightened
politicians, throwing the woolly hats a nut cutlet.
This is no call for complacency or rampant, unbridled emissions of air
pollutants. There remain many, many issues to tackle, including
slack, lazy government and rich individual and corporate greed, plus
every day ignorance and complacency.
Rather
it is a call for reason, balance and fact based argument,
before dubious hysterical, zealous and knee jerk judgement.
And
above all a call for firm, continuing governmental support for the
REAL sustained improvements that have been wrought, so far, in
people’s lives in the last 100 years.
Rather
than the modern penchant to ban or subsidise everything in a panicked
sop to a minority of vitriolic dreamers, government, entirely paid
for by the taxpayer (“there is no such thing as public money
– there is only taxpayers’ money”), should
honestly and forthrightly live up to the broad social contract; to
keep the nation safe, prevent excess of greed and set and impose
the legal limits to balance economy and environment for everyone’s
benefit, but with a light touch.
|